Who is helping overfishing




















New OECD research shows there are viable alternatives to the most harmful types of subsidies , and that an improved understanding of how subsidies affect the fishing sector can help governments achieve their goals, but without depleting the resource base. In fact, the path to prosperity for fishers ironically lies in reducing fishing activities so that fish stocks can increase to sustainable levels.

Over the last 20 years, governments have had numerous discussions on how they might work together to reduce these subsidies and have engaged in negotiations bilaterally, regionally, and are currently engaged in multilateral negotiations at the World Trade Organization.

To reverse the current unsustainable trend of subsidising the fishing industry, governments will need to take an entirely new approach to how they support fishers. Fishers can still benefit from government support, but governments need to remove the incentive to over-fish. Such policies include programmes that ensure financial institutions can provide the necessary working capital for small fishing businesses, or programmes that increase the business or operational skills of fishers.

What would happen if the money currently spent on the worst kinds of subsidies were shifted to the best performing ones? From Atlantic underwater canyons to local rivers, we are working to protect and revive ecosystems.

Our litigators and advocates helped restore water flows to California's San Joaquin River and bring back wild salmon to the region.

A healthier river system could soon support a vibrant salmon population—and a commercial fishery. The legislation weakens key fishery conservation protections, such as annual catch limits and successful timelines for rebuilding depleted stocks. We will keep you informed with the latest alerts and progress reports. All of these tools help fishermen to better understand the fish stocks in a given area. Similarly, CatchScanner uses machine vision to make 3D images of fish that can be analyzed as they are hauled aboard a vessel, allowing fishing crews to accurately determine species and weight and, if needed, relocate to waters with better and more plentiful supply.

A handheld version, CatchSnap, could even be used on mobile phones, enabling smaller vessels to make use of the technology. The data collected by CatchScanner could also help to stop vessels catching more than the EU quota allows.

In , Sweden, the UK, and Ireland all had hauls significantly above the total allowable catch recommended by scientists.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum. The role of business in responding to the planetary emergency is more important than ever. This is how it can help deliver a resilient, prosperous future. We urgently need to scale up solutions that accelerate the transition towards more sustainable land use practices. These innovations are leading the way. I accept. Take action on UpLink. UpLink — Take Action for Ocean.

Forum in focus. Read more about this project. By promoting responsible fishing practices — like setting science-based catch limits, tracking IUU fishing and eliminating fishing subsidies — Oceana is safeguarding fisheries as a valuable source of food and jobs for the future. If managed sustainably, the oceans can provide enough fish to feed more than a billion people a healthy seafood meal each day.

Oceana works for concrete policy changes that protect forage species to maintain abundant wildlife populations and sustainable fisheries which depend on productive forage fish populations. Chile is on track to dramatically rebuild its fisheries, thanks to new science-based fishing quotas for important species, including common hake, anchoveta, sardines and jack mackerel, all of which are overfished.

The government reduced the quota for common hake by 55 percent, for anchoveta by 65 percent in specific regions and for sardines by 29 percent in specific regions. The only increased quota was for the jack mackerel fishery, which is recovering after previous quota reductions. Reducing quotas will allow these seriously overfished species time to recover and rebuild, to the benefit of fishermen and ocean health.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000